Skip to main content

A Discovery of Witches: S2 Review

 It begins with absence and desire. It begins with blood and fear. It begins with A Discovery of Witches… season two. Picking up right where the first season left off, with our two leads Diana (Teresa Palmer) and Matthew (Matthew Goode) landing in London, it’s certainly a lot more action-packed than its predecessor.  As it dances between both past and present – with every character encountering problems everywhere they go – there’s almost never a dull moment.

It helps that the show is also visually stunning. With a rich, earthy-toned colour scheme, and contemporary Oxford, Elizabethan London, and Gothic castles for settings, as well as some very sophisticated special effects in the form of the witches’ magic, there’s no denying that this season is a treat to look at, aside from the peculiar array of outfits that look vaguely like curtains that Diana was frequently adorning. And the weird amount of bloodletting that the characters were getting up to, but maybe I’m just squeamish. After all, it is Elizabethan England. Everyone has such beautiful blue eyes that I can look past these less aesthetically pleasing aspects.

Aside from making a very pretty supernatural couple, Matthew and Diana are admittedly the weak links in our cast of characters. Though both are perfectly decent actors, the rapport between them is definitely less compelling than it was in season one, probably due to the fact they emotionally bonded themselves for life (that usually tends to dull the spark a little), and is most evident in their slightly stilted dialogue. Additionally, the way almost every single other character they come across goes above and beyond to serve the pair of them isn’t very believable, but they are still quite sweet for the most part. Aside from Matthew’s newly developed possessiveness, punctuated by actual growling, which did make me chuckle, but grew increasingly annoying.

“Though you might miss some things if you stop paying attention, it’s relatively easy viewing, and although it’s definitely not ground-breaking, it is fun.”

The rest of the characters more than make up for them, though. Interesting dynamics abound – villains colluding with villains; vampires, demons, witches, and humans all intermingling; a lot of bartering and power play – and the ‘chosen one’ syndrome that Diana is suffering from is luckily not found in any of the others. However, I must admit that this main character syndrome is quite helpful in carrying the plot forward. At least, it is for Matthew and Diana – the rest of the characters have to slog along and work things out for themselves!

On that note, it’s the series’ plot that stands out the most. Both tying up loose ends from season one and creating several threads to lead into season three (which is coming at an unknown date), the stakes are a lot higher, inevitably leading to a lot more drama. And, as someone who enjoys a bit of a wild plot, a lot more fun. There’s a new, unknown, murderous – or should I say bloodthirsty – vampire roaming present day Oxford, seemingly constant obstacles in Matthew and Diana’s relationship back in 1590, and some good old domestic drama occurring at the de Clermont family home, as more and more supernatural beings head their way over to France. Essentially, there’s a little bit of something for everyone, but particularly romance fans.

So, all in all? I would recommend A Discovery of Witches to everyone. Though you might miss some things if you stop paying attention, it’s relatively easy viewing, and although it’s definitely not ground-breaking, it is fun. And, unusually for a fantasy show in my experience, it’s fairly PG-13, meaning you can watch with the whole family! If you’re looking for a solid binge watch with drama, romance, and the supernatural, then this is the one for you. Enjoy!

These words are on the Indiependent if anyone wants to check it out!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Black Swan as a Modern Gothic Text

SPOILERS AHEAD Ballet and the gothic have quite a lot in common: they both originated in Italy, as all good things seem to; they both desire to evoke emotion; and they seem to have perfectly intertwined in Darren Aronofsky’s (pretty controversial) masterpiece, Black Swan. Whilst on the surface this just seems like a psychological thriller, if you pay attention you’ll find a million and one different features of the gothic implemented to build up the terror. And it certainly worked— I’ve never been more on edge.  CHARACTER Whilst Nina Sayers is the main character of Black Swan, there are two other characters in this film who play key roles in bringing to life it’s gothic elements: Lily, Nina’s rival; and Thomas Leroy, the choreographer behind it all. All three of them fall into at least one traditional gothic role. Nina and Lily occupy each end of the Madonna-Whore dichotomy, respectively. With her childlike innocence, pristine appearance, and light colour-scheme, Nina very much con...

Francis Ford Coppola vs. The BBC: Which Dracula Retelling Do I Prefer?

Ever since it's publication in 1897, Bram Stoker's iconic Gothic Vampire novel Dracula has been retold and repurposed hundreds of times. From classic- although unlicensed- horrors such as Nosferatu, to cartoon comedies like Hotel Transylvania, despite being staked through the heart, the aristocratic Count will live on forever in popular culture. Today, I will be comparing the 1992 Francis Ford Coppola directed film Bram Stoker's Dracula (original title, I know) to the 2020 BBC three-part adaptation Dracula (yet another ground-breaking title) and deciding which one I prefer. I can give you a hint now: it's the BBC version. Sorry to all the film bros out there, who would probably consider that as blasphemy. I will be exploring the reasons for this preference via three main areas: the storylines/aesthetics of the whole thing put together, the women (mainly Mina and Agatha, respectively), and the formidable Count himself. So, let's take a journey back through time, to t...

The Magic of Suspiria (1977)

WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD Suspiria (1977) is a very divisive film. Some love it; others believe it to be one of the most overrated films of all time. Centred around a dance school and yet featuring almost no actual dancing, the story follows Suzy Bannion— from her arrival at a prestigious academy, to her eventual exit: running for her life and overcome with hysterical laughter. But what happens in the slick 90 minutes between these two events that causes such difference of opinion? Is Suspiria really Dario Argento’s masterpiece, or is just a bygone product of its era— scary in the 70s, but just another giallo of many to us now? In terms of the visual experience, the answer is no. Suspiria is a feast for the eyes from start to finish. There’s meaning in everything you look at. Particularly, the colour red. One could fill an entire novel analysing every time a rouge tone appeared on the screen during this film; but I’ll try not to. In the most obvious colour theory, red means danger. Su...